<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoOPlist &#187; Critics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pooplist.net/category/critics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pooplist.net</link>
	<description>POmpous and Opinionated Persons - Being the collected musings on music and pop culture of a few wizened observers ready to bloviate...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Has the internet killed local music scenes?</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2010/06/11/has-the-internet-killed-local-music-scenes/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2010/06/11/has-the-internet-killed-local-music-scenes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OT?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=2652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting think piece : Has the internet killed local music scenes? Could this be said to explain the sameness of the Nike/Fader mixes we mentioned the other day?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting think piece : <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jun/10/local-music-scenes-internet">Has the internet killed local music scenes?</a></p>
<p>Could this be said to explain the sameness of the <a href="http://www.thefader.com/tag/pitch-perfect/">Nike/Fader mixes</a> we <a href="http://pooplist.net/2010/06/09/world-cup-fever-yields-fun-mixes-from-unlikely-source/">mentioned</a> the other day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2010/06/11/has-the-internet-killed-local-music-scenes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That other list is out</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2010/01/22/that-other-list-is-out-2/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2010/01/22/that-other-list-is-out-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=2211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That other list is out LPs 1. Animal Collective &#8211; Merriweather Post Pavilion &#8211; Domino 2. Phoenix &#8211; Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix &#8211; Glassnote 3. Neko Case &#8211; Middle Cyclone &#8211; Anti 4. Yeah Yeah Yeahs &#8211; It&#8217;s Blitz! &#8211; DGC/Interscope 5. Dirty Projectors &#8211; Bitte Orca &#8211; Domino 6. Grizzly Bear &#8211; Veckatimest &#8211; Warp [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/" target="_blank">other</a> list is out</p>
<p><strong>LPs</strong><br />
1. Animal Collective &#8211; <em>Merriweather Post Pavilion</em>  &#8211;   Domino<br />
2. Phoenix &#8211;  <em>Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix</em>  &#8211; Glassnote<br />
3. Neko Case &#8211;  <em>Middle Cyclone</em>  &#8211; Anti<br />
4. Yeah Yeah Yeahs &#8211;  <em>It&#8217;s Blitz!</em> &#8211; DGC/Interscope<br />
5. Dirty Projectors &#8211;  <em>Bitte Orca</em> &#8211; Domino<br />
6. Grizzly Bear &#8211;  <em>Veckatimest</em> &#8211; Warp<br />
7. The xx &#8211;  <em>xx </em> &#8211;  Young Turks<br />
8. Raekwon &#8211;  <em>Only Built 4 Cuban Linx&#8230;Part II</em> &#8211; Ice H2O/EMI<br />
9. The Flaming Lips &#8211;  <em>Embryonic</em> &#8211; Warner<br />
10. Girls &#8211; <em>Album True</em> &#8211; Panther</p>
<p><strong>Singles</strong><br />
1. Jay-Z (ft. Alicia Keys) &#8211; <em> &#8220;Empire State of Mind&#8221;</em> &#8211; Roc Nation<br />
2. Phoenix &#8211;  <em>&#8220;1901&#8243;</em> &#8211; Glassnote<br />
3. Animal Collective &#8211;  <em>&#8220;My Girls&#8221;</em> &#8211; Domino<br />
4. Grizzly Bear &#8211;  <em>&#8220;Two Weeks&#8221;</em> &#8211; Warp<br />
5. Dirty Projectors &#8211;  <em>&#8220;Stillness Is the Move&#8221;</em> &#8211; Domino<br />
6. Yeah Yeah Yeahs &#8211;  <em>&#8220;Zero&#8221;</em> &#8211; DGC/Interscope<br />
7. Lady Gaga &#8211;  <em>&#8220;Bad Romance&#8221;</em> &#8211; Streamline/Interscope<br />
8. Girls &#8211;  <em>&#8220;Lust for Life&#8221;</em> &#8211; True Panther<br />
9. Phoenix &#8211;  <em>&#8220;Lisztomania&#8221;</em> &#8211; Glassnote<br />
10. Taylor Swift &#8211;  <em>&#8220;You Belong With Me&#8221;</em> &#8211; Big Machine</p>
<p>Chuck Eddy has an <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-01-19/music/the-year-of-too-much-consensus/">interesting piece</a> on the consensus, wondering why the dinosaur critics appear to be more wide-ranging in their listening than the indie-rock crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2010/01/22/that-other-list-is-out-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR, NME (also P4k, Paste, Uncut) release &#8220;Best Albums of the &#8217;00s&#8221; &#8211; Reliably, predicatably, play to own audiences</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/11/19/npr-nme-also-p4k-paste-uncut-release-best-albums-of-the-00s-reliably-predicatably-play-to-own-audiences/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/11/19/npr-nme-also-p4k-paste-uncut-release-best-albums-of-the-00s-reliably-predicatably-play-to-own-audiences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarkZ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/2009/11/19/npr-nme-also-p4k-paste-uncut-release-best-albums-of-the-00s-reliably-predicatably-play-to-own-audiences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPR: An important distinction: We&#8217;re not looking for everyone&#8217;s favorite albums or songs, but rather ones that had some sort of historical significance. These are the game-changers &#8212; ones that signaled some sort of shift in music, or ones that were particularly influential in some way. We&#8217;re looking for the albums and singles people will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR:</p>
<blockquote><p><i><br />
An important distinction: We&#8217;re not looking for everyone&#8217;s favorite albums or songs, but rather ones that had some sort of historical significance. These are the game-changers &#8212; ones that signaled some sort of shift in music, or ones that were particularly influential in some way. We&#8217;re looking for the albums and singles people will still buy, share, listen to and talk about for years or decades to come.&#8221;<br />
</i></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/allsongs/2009/11/the_decades_50_most_important.html">NPR: The Decade&#8217;s 50 Most Important Recordings</a> is the plain, unadorned, list. You can see a <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120326033">written discussion of the list here</a>. They take pains to say that these are &#8220;important&#8221; choices rather than &#8220;favourites&#8221;. But, given that they <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/allsongs/2009/11/nominate_the_decades_most_impo.html"> solicited input from their listeners</a>, it&#8217;s no surprise that the list plays pretty safely within the limits of middlebrow, educated, white American tastes. Of course, by specifying &#8220;important&#8221; the NPR staffers get the chance to incorporate a salting of &#8220;outsider&#8221; stuff. I&#8217;d really have to try hard to find ways in which  Juanes&#8217; <i>Fijate Bien&#8221;</i> can be claimed as influential. </p>
<p>The NME, on the other hand, decides to sit around the pup and scribble a list of guitar and indie rock items on the back of a coaster and give it to an intern for a couple of hours so that (s)he can add some of the &#8220;yoof&#8221; influence and make sure the items <em>were</em> actually released in the 00&#8242;s. Then they spread <a href="http://www.nme.com/list/the-top-100-greatest-albums-of-the-decade/158049/">The Top 100 Greatest Albums of the Decade</a> over a bunch of web pages in order to boost their page view numbers. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2009/11/the-best-albums-of-the-decade.html">Paste Magazine has another</a>, somewhat less predictable list. </p>
<p>Earlier, Pitchfork concluded their 200 Albums of the 2000s with <a href="http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7710-the-top-200-albums-of-the-2000s-20-1/">the final 20</a></p>
<p>Can&#8217;t find the Uncut Magazine original list, but Stereogum has the top 20 <a href="http://stereogum.com/archives/list/uncuts_top_20_albums_of_the_00s_093691.html">here</a></p>
<p>Someone will probably put these all together. If you know a link lemme know.</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, f**k Radiohead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/11/19/npr-nme-also-p4k-paste-uncut-release-best-albums-of-the-00s-reliably-predicatably-play-to-own-audiences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One nation under a Moog.</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/10/10/one-nation-under-a-moog/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/10/10/one-nation-under-a-moog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=1766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simon Reynolds in The Guardian on the development of synth pop (in the UK in particular) Takes in quite a bit for a mainstream pub: One nation under a Moog &#124; Music &#124; The Guardian (Reynolds often publishes the uncut version on his site later.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon Reynolds in The Guardian on the development of synth pop (in the UK in particular) Takes in quite a bit for a mainstream pub: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/oct/10/synth-pop-80s-reynolds">One nation under a Moog | 				Music | 				The Guardian </a> (Reynolds often publishes the uncut version on his site later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/10/10/one-nation-under-a-moog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Odds on Winner of Mercury Music Prize</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/07/15/latest-odds-on-winner-of-mercury-music-prize/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/07/15/latest-odds-on-winner-of-mercury-music-prize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=1674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mercury Music Prize is a &#8220;prestigious&#8221; prize awarded to an album made by a British or Irish act in the previous year. Current top 5: Florence And The Machine 5.00 Lily Allen 6.00 Bat For Lashes 8.00 Doves 8.00 Little Boots 8.00 I&#8217;m a little surprised by Lily Allen and Doves being so high [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mercury Music Prize is a &#8220;prestigious&#8221; prize awarded to an album made by a British or Irish act in the previous year.<br />
Current top 5:</p>
<p>Florence And The Machine 5.00<br />
Lily Allen 6.00<br />
Bat For Lashes 8.00<br />
Doves 8.00<br />
Little Boots 8.00</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little surprised by Lily Allen and Doves being so high up. Their stars had seemed to be declining. Florence and Doves apparently benefited from well-received performances  at Glastonbury (despite the prize being awarded &#8220;solely on the basis of the music on the album&#8221;). You can see the full list at the:  <a href="http://www.ladbrokes.com/lbr_sports?action=go_generic_link&#038;level=EVENT&#038;key=212815475&#038;category=SPECIALS&#038;subtypes=&#038;default_sort=&#038;tab=undefined"> Ladbrokes betting line on the Mercury Music Prize</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/07/15/latest-odds-on-winner-of-mercury-music-prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steven Wells Says Goodbye</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/06/26/steven-wells-says-goodbye/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/06/26/steven-wells-says-goodbye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=1623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIP Swells &#8211; He was equally annoying and entertaining, and never pulled punches. His takedowns of pompous and self important NME faves were always worth reading.   Steven Wells Says Goodbye (Philadelphia Weely)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP Swells &#8211; He was equally annoying and entertaining, and never pulled punches. His takedowns of pompous and self important NME faves were always worth reading.   <a href="http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/news-and-opinion/in-extremis/Steven-Wells-Says-Goodbye-49054426.html">Steven Wells Says Goodbye</a> (Philadelphia Weely)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/06/26/steven-wells-says-goodbye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christgau &#8211; Poptastic Bye-Bye &#8211; ARTicles</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/28/christgau-poptastic-bye-bye-articles/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/28/christgau-poptastic-bye-bye-articles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=1557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christgau on his recent peregrinations. Including Voice, stone, Blender and more. Really, theses days, who would want to be a writer? Poptastic Bye-Bye &#8211; ARTicles. (NAJP.org)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christgau on his recent peregrinations. Including Voice, stone, Blender and more. Really, theses days, who would want to be a writer? <a href="http://www.najp.org/articles/2009/03/under-the-axe.html">Poptastic Bye-Bye &#8211; ARTicles</a>. (NAJP.org)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/28/christgau-poptastic-bye-bye-articles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hardcore Continuum</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/05/the-hardcore-continuum/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/05/the-hardcore-continuum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=1546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that man Reynolds again. This time with an eloquent and informative breeze through his approach to the last 20 years of UK &#8216;ardcore. Remarkably readable and fascinating. Energy Flash &#8211; The Hardcore Continuum Theory and Its Discontents The text of a talk by Simon Reynolds delivered at FACT, Liverpool, Wednesday 11th February 2009.  PLUS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that man Reynolds again. This time with an eloquent and informative breeze through his approach to the last 20 years of UK &#8216;ardcore. Remarkably readable and fascinating.</p>
<p><a href="http://energyflashbysimonreynolds.blogspot.com/2009/02/hardcore-continuum-or-theory-and-its.html">Energy Flash &#8211; The Hardcore Continuum</a> </p>
<p>Theory and Its Discontents<br />
The text of a talk by Simon Reynolds delivered at FACT, Liverpool, Wednesday 11th February 2009. <br />
PLUS<br />
notes for points to be brought up during the dialogue segment with Mark Fisher but weren&#8217;t owing to time running out<br />
PLUS<br />
afterthoughts on the past, present and future of the hardcore continuum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/05/the-hardcore-continuum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is your sampling epiphany?</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/04/what-is-your-sampling-epiphany/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/04/what-is-your-sampling-epiphany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sampling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/2009/03/04/what-is-your-sampling-epiphany/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An unofficial compilation of tracks sampled by Massive Attack showcases the group&#8217;s aesthetic through the songs that informed it – and provides fans with the thrill of discovering the originals. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/feb/26/sampling-epiphany-massive-attack (Simon Reynolds at The Guardian, UK)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An unofficial compilation of tracks sampled by Massive Attack showcases the group&#8217;s aesthetic through the songs that informed it – and provides fans with the thrill of discovering the originals. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/feb/26/sampling-epiphany-massive-attack">http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/feb/26/sampling-epiphany-massive-attack</a> (Simon Reynolds at The Guardian, UK)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/03/04/what-is-your-sampling-epiphany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sgt Pepper must die!</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2007/06/15/sgt-pepper-must-die/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2007/06/15/sgt-pepper-must-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever get the feeling you&#8217;ve been cheated? It&#8217;s meant to be a classic album, but all you can hear is a load of boring tripe &#8230; we&#8217;ve all felt that way. And so have the musicians we asked to nominate the supposedly great records they&#8217;d gladly never hear again Sgt. Pepper Must Die! (Guardian UK)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever get the feeling you&#8217;ve been cheated? It&#8217;s meant to be a classic album, but all you can hear is a load of boring tripe &#8230; we&#8217;ve all felt that way. And so have the musicians we asked to nominate the supposedly great records they&#8217;d gladly never hear again  <a href="http://music.guardian.co.uk/rock/story/0,,2102991,00.html" target="_blank"><b> Sgt. Pepper Must Die!</b></a>  (Guardian UK)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2007/06/15/sgt-pepper-must-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
