<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoOPlist &#187; CD reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pooplist.net/category/cd-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pooplist.net</link>
	<description>POmpous and Opinionated Persons - Being the collected musings on music and pop culture of a few wizened observers ready to bloviate...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>That other list is out&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2012/01/19/that-other-list-is-out-3/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2012/01/19/that-other-list-is-out-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=3587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though there are lots of reasons to not support the Village Voice, there is a PoOP tradition of noting the arrival of the granddaddy of POmpous and OPinionated Music Lists. So there you have it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hr />
<P><br />
<a href="http://pooplist.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pazzlogo.jpg"><img src="http://pooplist.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pazzlogo-300x33.jpg" alt="Village Voice Pazz n Jop Poll 2011" title="Village Voice Pazz n Jop Poll 2011" width="300" height="33" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3590" /></a><br />
</P><br />
<P><br />
Even though there are <a href="http://www.indiewire.com/article/264fda20-3734-11e1-97b6-123138165f92" title="Village Voice fires J Hoberman">lots of reasons</a> to not support the Village Voice, there is a PoOP tradition of noting the arrival of <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/" target="_blank"> the granddaddy of POmpous and OPinionated Music Lists</a>. So there you have it.<br />
</P><br />
<P></p>
<hr />
</P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2012/01/19/that-other-list-is-out-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That &#8220;other&#8221; list is out (2010 edition)</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2011/01/20/that-other-list-is-out-2010-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2011/01/20/that-other-list-is-out-2010-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=3103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PoOPsters, start your engines &#8211; What will the correlation of &#8220;theirs&#8221; be to &#8220;ours&#8221; - Pazz and Jop]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PoOPsters, start your engines &#8211; What will the correlation of &#8220;theirs&#8221; be to &#8220;ours&#8221; - <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/">Pazz and Jop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2011/01/20/that-other-list-is-out-2010-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remarkable interactive infographics: Year in Reviews 2010 (P4K Edition)</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2011/01/08/remarkable-interactive-infographics-year-in-reviews-2010-p4k-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2011/01/08/remarkable-interactive-infographics-year-in-reviews-2010-p4k-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=2985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward Segel has a very cool infographic at: Year in Reviews 2010 It features all the Pitchfork album reviews of 2010 arranged according to rating and it pops up images and links. I&#8217;m sure my statistician sister can tell you what the technical term is for this sort of presentation of data. I think it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yearinreviews.com/"><img src="http://pooplist.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/yearinreviewsinfographic-300x191.jpg" alt="YearInReviewsInfographic" title="YearInReviewsInfographic" width="300" height="191" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2987" /></a><br />
Edward Segel has a very cool infographic at: <a href="http://www.yearinreviews.com/">Year in Reviews 2010</a></p>
<p>It features all the Pitchfork album reviews of 2010 arranged according to rating and it pops up images and links. I&#8217;m sure my statistician sister can tell you what the technical term is for this sort of presentation of data. I think it is &#8220;cool&#8221;.</p>
<p>Note that if you want to get a 10 at P4K it helps to be a millionaire or a deluxe reissue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2011/01/08/remarkable-interactive-infographics-year-in-reviews-2010-p4k-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The White Album, Heard in 1968 and Pronounced Boring. And Now?</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/10/02/the-white-album-heard-in-1968-and-pronounced-boring-and-now/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/10/02/the-white-album-heard-in-1968-and-pronounced-boring-and-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=1758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weeks NYT Popcast has a fascinating discussion between Ben Sisario and one of my favorite writers, Nik Cohn. Really good insights into how the times influenced Cohn&#8217;s review in The Times back in &#8217;68.  I found myself nodding in agreement and saying &#8220;Yes! You put your finger on it!&#8221;   The White Album, Heard in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weeks NYT Popcast has a fascinating discussion between Ben Sisario and one of my favorite writers, Nik Cohn. Really good insights into how the times influenced Cohn&#8217;s review in The Times back in &#8217;68.  I found myself nodding in agreement and saying &#8220;Yes! You put your finger on it!&#8221;   <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/the-white-album-heard-in-1968-and-pronounced-boring-and-now/" target="_blank">The White Album, Heard in 1968 and Pronounced Boring. And Now?</a></p>
<p>PS: You&#8217;ve heard the term &#8220;He&#8217;s got a face fit for radio&#8221;?  Well,  Jon Pareles has a voice fit for the newspaper.  Someone <strong>really</strong> needs to help him with microphone /  headphone  technique and perhaps give him a nice expectorant&#8230; But if you struggle through his review the Sisario / Cohn conversation is well worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/10/02/the-white-album-heard-in-1968-and-pronounced-boring-and-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce&#8217;s Not So Great As They Say New Disc</title>
		<link>http://pooplist.net/2009/02/09/bruces-not-so-great-as-they-say-new-disc/</link>
		<comments>http://pooplist.net/2009/02/09/bruces-not-so-great-as-they-say-new-disc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MikeJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooplist.net/?p=1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Springsteen &#8211; Working On A Dream From Springsteen we’ve come to expect, if not outright demand, the rich, multi-hued detail of every moment, making ‘Working On A Dream’s weird one: It sounds real good but what does it mean? Springsteen has always taken his heralded influences and made them work for him but here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Springsteen &#8211; <strong>Working On A Dream</strong></p>
<p>	From Springsteen we’ve come to expect, if not outright demand, the rich, multi-hued detail of every moment, making ‘Working On A Dream’s weird one: It sounds real good but what does it mean? </p>
<p>	Springsteen has always taken his heralded influences and made them work for him but here he works for them and, opposite his granite rep, doesn’t always get the job done. If these dark ages really were the old radio glory days his writing harkens back to, “My Lucky Day” and the CCR-ish title track would deservedly be blasting from every brownstone window and GI bill back porch; every tinny radio in every teenager’s first car would be tuned in and cranked up. FM would be studying the album versions, or perhaps the darker b-sides, say for instance, “The Wrestler”, “The Last Carnival”, “Life Itself” and “Kingdom of Days”.</p>
<p>	Certainly, he hasn’t sung like this in ages: That big, American holler that lights up the spirit is in full power but what do we make of tuneful fluff like “Queen Of  The Supermarket”, a semi-finalist for this disc’s worst song (“Surprise, Surprise” takes that honor, the distorted blues mash “Good Eye” the runner-up) and its sonic attempt to mimic his last album’s best song “Girls In Their Summer Clothes”? “Outlaw Pete” sounds like one of those great, late night FM gems – driving strings, canyon-sized howls, drums, and guitar crunch – but I’ll ask again, what does it mean? Do we really need another goth-Western myth at a time when all our excesses have come due and reality is smacking us around on a global scale?</p>
<p>	I know I’m setting myself up for a grand inquisition within Springsteen circles but I cannot help but suspect that all these sing-a-longs will go far in concert, giving Bruce more than a few break-away moments (a la “Hungry Heart”) where he pulls a few deep breaths while the audience bellows away. And trust me, it will instill a brief sense of community until the faithful hit the parking lots and the anarchy ensues. </p>
<p>	PS: As far as the DVD that is included with the collector’s edition, the real treat is the special, made for Halloween song/video “Night Of The Jersey Devil”: Bruce all devil/preacher/Johnny Cash emerging from the bog and burning the whole place down. The documentary, “Working On A Dream –The Sessions” takes itself a tad too seriously, with all these pensive close-ups of our hero playing and listening to playbacks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooplist.net/2009/02/09/bruces-not-so-great-as-they-say-new-disc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

